Perspectives on Aural Rehabilitation and Its Instrumentation
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perspectives on Aural Rehabilitation and Its Instrumentation 15 18-28 April 2008.
doi:10.1044/arii15.1.18 Copyright 2008 by American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luckhurst, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Professional Preparedness for Provision of Auditory Oral Programs to Children With Hearing Loss: Results of a Survey

Joan A. Luckhurst

Speech-Language-Hearing Science Program, La Salle University
Philadelphia, PA

Advances in technology have facilitated development of auditory-oral skills in greater numbers of children who are deaf. In addition, mainstream educational placements are increasing for this population. Since success in the mainstream is largely dependent upon development of oral communication skills, it is imperative that professionals working with these children have competence in auditory-oral methodology. The present study investigated professionals' perceptions of preparedness to develop and implement auditory-oral programs. Professionals using an auditory-oral approach were asked about their perceived levels of knowledge and skills, pre-service training, and on-the-job factors that contributed to their competence to provide auditory-oral programs to children who are deaf. Classification tables, chi-square, and qualitative analyses were used to determine professionals' perceptions of preparedness and to identify significant differences among professional groups (i.e., speech-language pathologists, teachers of the deaf, audiologists), as well as specific aspects of pre-service and occupational training that promoted knowledge and skills. Results indicated that a significant number of professionals in all groups feel unprepared. Specific group differences and needed components for adequate preparation are discussed. Suggestions for further study are presented.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Copyright 2008 by American Speech-Language-Hearing Association